The aim of this activity is to ride in real traffic conditions and evaluate the capabilities of standard technology to monitor the occurrence of possible inevitable collision states in relevant situations such as a car following scenario.
Showing posts with label MAEB. Show all posts
Showing posts with label MAEB. Show all posts
Wednesday, 25 May 2016
On road tests
You may have seen us around in Florence with our test vehicle, a noticeable Malaguti Spidermax 500 equipped with laser scanner and a number of other gadgets.
The aim of this activity is to ride in real traffic conditions and evaluate the capabilities of standard technology to monitor the occurrence of possible inevitable collision states in relevant situations such as a car following scenario.
The aim of this activity is to ride in real traffic conditions and evaluate the capabilities of standard technology to monitor the occurrence of possible inevitable collision states in relevant situations such as a car following scenario.
Friday, 4 March 2016
Can we observe realistic emergency manoeuvres in a riding simulator?
Can we induce realistic emergency reactions in a motorcycle simulator?
In a new experiment conducted at the Driving Simulator facilities of the Monash University Accident Research Centre, 15 riders had to face an unexpected imminent collision scenario while simulating a relaxing ride in the countryside. The group of riders included commuters, recreational riders, and professional riders such as trainers and Police riders.
Where they able to react properly or did they panic? Or rather: was the motorcycole simulator developed for the ABRAM project able to induce realistic reactions?
The results of this experiment will be crucial to determine whether tests with a simple and reproducible simulator such as the ABRAM simulator can be used to learn more about typical riders' reactions when facing inevitable collision situations. Additional knowledge in this field is fundamental to inform the design of last resort safety systems such as MAEB. In particular, MAEB activation should be designed to deal with any situation: the system should not interfere with a collision avoidance attempted by the rider, nor exacerbate the risks of severe crash outcomes in case of a panic reaction of the rider.
Friday, 31 July 2015
ABRAM Periodic Report - Publishable Summary
(From the official document submitted to the European Commission)
Mobility is vital for the quality of life and efficient transport is an important goal for the European Commission. An increased use of motorcycles and mopeds - also known as powered two wheelers (PTW) - instead of passenger cars for the needs of personal mobility would result in more efficient utilisation of road and parking space, less pollution, and time savings. However, the risks of being seriously injured or killed are higher for PTW riders than for other motorized road users. In particular, the European Road Safety Observatory (ERSO) indicated that the risk of incurring into a fatal crash while riding a PTW per km travelled is 12 times higher than for driving a passenger car. Passenger cars have benefitted of many new safety technologies, some of which at a later stage were translated to motorcycles – occasionally with proven success, for example antilock brake system. At present, one of the most advanced safety systems available is Autonomous Emergency Braking (AEB). AEB is designed to recognise an impending collision and then apply brakes when the driver does not. AEB effectiveness was recently demonstrated for cars, and AEB is promoted as safety feature by NCAP and a range of government bodies. However, AEB is currently not available for motorcycles and its possible applicability is unknown.
In this context, the ABRAM project (Autonomous Braking for Motorcycles, June 2013-May 2016) proposed a broad exploration of AEB applied to PTWs. ABRAM aimed to address the main aspects linked to the evaluation and implementation of autonomous braking for PTWs in order to create scientific bases for a possible development of this safety system.
The outgoing phase of ABRAM – conducted by Chief Investigator Dr Giovanni Savino at the Monash University Accident Research Centre, Melbourne, Australia – was completed in May 2015. During this two-year period, three main activities were carried out.
The first activity (WP2) focused on the development of an idealised AEB for motorcycles. It considered the applicability of AEB to real-world crashes; then it developed triggering algorithms to address typical crash configuration, and fìnally it evaluated the potential benefits of AEB for motorcycles via computer simulations of real world crash cases which took place in three different countries: Italy, Sweden and New South Wales (Australia).
The second activity (WP3) analysed the feasibility of a mild, unexpected automatic deceleration of the motorcycle, such as the one produced by AEB, from the viewpoint of the rider. An experimental study involving an instrumented test vehicle and participant riders was conducted. Bosch Australia supported this activity by providing access to a low-speed test track and providing logistical support for the tests.
The third activity (WP4) focused on the possible interactions between AEB intervention and rider control actions during the pre-crash phase. Good knowledge of the rider behaviour is a crucial element for the design of the safety system. For this reason, a low-cost motorcycle riding simulator was developed and validated specifically for investigating the control inputs of riders when facing unexpected hazards.
Results of ABRAM research showed that the idealised AEB has good potential for an application to real world motorcycle crashes. Estimated applicability ranged from 28% to 32% when analysing computer simulations of 212 in-depth crash cases that took place in Europe and Australia. Also, the impact speed reduction produced by AEB on the host motorcycle was up to 7 km/h in the simulations. As a final outcome, the speed reduction produced by AEB is expected to produce injury mitigation for the riders. However, risk curves for motorcycle riders are currently not available in the literature, giving scope for future studies in this field to confirm the potential benefits of AEB.
Concerning the feasibility of an automatic deceleration event, ABRAM tests involved a sample of sixteen participants and showed that standard riders can sustain a moderate deceleration – such as the one produced by cutting the engine ignition - with minor-to-moderate efforts even when the event is unexpected. Although limited in scope due to the small sample and due to the simple procedure adopted, these encouraging findings are the first available on this topic and warrant future investigations. Additional tests should also analyse the interaction between rider and safety system in hazardous situations, for example due to sudden obstacles. The ABRAM riding simulator was validated appositely for this kind of tests and will foster future experiments in this field.
The ABRAM project has already shown an impact on the scientific community and the society. First, a number of scientific papers were presented on journals and at technical conferences, including the following:
Mobility is vital for the quality of life and efficient transport is an important goal for the European Commission. An increased use of motorcycles and mopeds - also known as powered two wheelers (PTW) - instead of passenger cars for the needs of personal mobility would result in more efficient utilisation of road and parking space, less pollution, and time savings. However, the risks of being seriously injured or killed are higher for PTW riders than for other motorized road users. In particular, the European Road Safety Observatory (ERSO) indicated that the risk of incurring into a fatal crash while riding a PTW per km travelled is 12 times higher than for driving a passenger car. Passenger cars have benefitted of many new safety technologies, some of which at a later stage were translated to motorcycles – occasionally with proven success, for example antilock brake system. At present, one of the most advanced safety systems available is Autonomous Emergency Braking (AEB). AEB is designed to recognise an impending collision and then apply brakes when the driver does not. AEB effectiveness was recently demonstrated for cars, and AEB is promoted as safety feature by NCAP and a range of government bodies. However, AEB is currently not available for motorcycles and its possible applicability is unknown.
In this context, the ABRAM project (Autonomous Braking for Motorcycles, June 2013-May 2016) proposed a broad exploration of AEB applied to PTWs. ABRAM aimed to address the main aspects linked to the evaluation and implementation of autonomous braking for PTWs in order to create scientific bases for a possible development of this safety system.
The outgoing phase of ABRAM – conducted by Chief Investigator Dr Giovanni Savino at the Monash University Accident Research Centre, Melbourne, Australia – was completed in May 2015. During this two-year period, three main activities were carried out.
The first activity (WP2) focused on the development of an idealised AEB for motorcycles. It considered the applicability of AEB to real-world crashes; then it developed triggering algorithms to address typical crash configuration, and fìnally it evaluated the potential benefits of AEB for motorcycles via computer simulations of real world crash cases which took place in three different countries: Italy, Sweden and New South Wales (Australia).
The second activity (WP3) analysed the feasibility of a mild, unexpected automatic deceleration of the motorcycle, such as the one produced by AEB, from the viewpoint of the rider. An experimental study involving an instrumented test vehicle and participant riders was conducted. Bosch Australia supported this activity by providing access to a low-speed test track and providing logistical support for the tests.
The third activity (WP4) focused on the possible interactions between AEB intervention and rider control actions during the pre-crash phase. Good knowledge of the rider behaviour is a crucial element for the design of the safety system. For this reason, a low-cost motorcycle riding simulator was developed and validated specifically for investigating the control inputs of riders when facing unexpected hazards.
Results of ABRAM research showed that the idealised AEB has good potential for an application to real world motorcycle crashes. Estimated applicability ranged from 28% to 32% when analysing computer simulations of 212 in-depth crash cases that took place in Europe and Australia. Also, the impact speed reduction produced by AEB on the host motorcycle was up to 7 km/h in the simulations. As a final outcome, the speed reduction produced by AEB is expected to produce injury mitigation for the riders. However, risk curves for motorcycle riders are currently not available in the literature, giving scope for future studies in this field to confirm the potential benefits of AEB.
Concerning the feasibility of an automatic deceleration event, ABRAM tests involved a sample of sixteen participants and showed that standard riders can sustain a moderate deceleration – such as the one produced by cutting the engine ignition - with minor-to-moderate efforts even when the event is unexpected. Although limited in scope due to the small sample and due to the simple procedure adopted, these encouraging findings are the first available on this topic and warrant future investigations. Additional tests should also analyse the interaction between rider and safety system in hazardous situations, for example due to sudden obstacles. The ABRAM riding simulator was validated appositely for this kind of tests and will foster future experiments in this field.
The ABRAM project has already shown an impact on the scientific community and the society. First, a number of scientific papers were presented on journals and at technical conferences, including the following:
* Further development of motorcycle autonomous emergency braking (MAEB), what can in-depth studies tell us?
* A novel approach for evaluating the potential benefits of motorcycle autonomous emergency braking (MAEB) in real world crashes
* Can Experienced Riders Benefit from an Autonomous Emergency Braking System?
Second, Dr Savino featured in popular on-line articles on the web and was involved in TV and radio segments - on BSB Australia, where he talked about motorcycle safety technologies and especially autonomous emergency braking; on radio ABC Melbourne, where he described the potential benefits and the challenges of autonomous emergency braking applied to motorcycles.
The research of ABRAM also featured in a number of the MIRI Big Impact, the magazine showcasing the best research conducted at the Monash Injury Research Centre. In addition, Dr Savino has arranged frequent exchanges with industrial stakeholders in the field of motorcycles for transferring the new knowledge produced within ABRAM and thus fostering the development of safety innovations.
The return phase of ABRAM (1st June 2015 – 31st May 2016) will be conducted by Dr Savino primarily at his host institution, the University of Florence, Italy. Three main activities are planned for this period. First, a sensitivity analysis will investigate the robustness of AEB and its effectiveness with respect of different pre-crash conditions, as well as different technologies used for the implementation of this safety system. Second, a naturalistic study will analyse the performance and the critical elements of a prototype AEB system in real traffic conditions. In particular, the obstacle detection system and the control logic will be tested (no autonomous braking event will be deployed at this stage). And final, a cost benefit analysis will be performed.
* A novel approach for evaluating the potential benefits of motorcycle autonomous emergency braking (MAEB) in real world crashes
* Can Experienced Riders Benefit from an Autonomous Emergency Braking System?
Second, Dr Savino featured in popular on-line articles on the web and was involved in TV and radio segments - on BSB Australia, where he talked about motorcycle safety technologies and especially autonomous emergency braking; on radio ABC Melbourne, where he described the potential benefits and the challenges of autonomous emergency braking applied to motorcycles.
The research of ABRAM also featured in a number of the MIRI Big Impact, the magazine showcasing the best research conducted at the Monash Injury Research Centre. In addition, Dr Savino has arranged frequent exchanges with industrial stakeholders in the field of motorcycles for transferring the new knowledge produced within ABRAM and thus fostering the development of safety innovations.
The return phase of ABRAM (1st June 2015 – 31st May 2016) will be conducted by Dr Savino primarily at his host institution, the University of Florence, Italy. Three main activities are planned for this period. First, a sensitivity analysis will investigate the robustness of AEB and its effectiveness with respect of different pre-crash conditions, as well as different technologies used for the implementation of this safety system. Second, a naturalistic study will analyse the performance and the critical elements of a prototype AEB system in real traffic conditions. In particular, the obstacle detection system and the control logic will be tested (no autonomous braking event will be deployed at this stage). And final, a cost benefit analysis will be performed.
Tuesday, 14 July 2015
ABRAM studies presented at ESV2015 and IV2015 conferences
Two recent studies developed within ABRAM were presented at the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles conference (ESV2015) in Gothenburg, Sweden, and at the IEEE Intelligent Vehicle Symposium (IV2015) in Seoul, Korea.
The first paper, titled "Autonomous emergency braking for cornering motorcycle", presented an advanced MAEB that can safely deploy a full braking even when the motorcycle is negotiating a bend. This system, named MAEB+, combined standard MAEB and ABC (active braking control), a module designed to adjust the braking distribution between front and rear wheel in order to produce a stabilisation of the vehicle along its trajectory. The paper also presented detailed computer simulations of three real world crashes from the InSafe dataset. Each case simulated in the actual configuration (without MAEB), with standard MAEB, and with MAEB+. The results showed that MAEB+ was able to slow down the motorcycle with higher deceleration compared to simple MAEB, without producing falling events in the pre-collision phase. These results indicated that a stability module associated to MAEB can make the system more robust even when the rider attempts lateral manoeuvres before the collision.
The second paper, titled "Triggering Algorithm based on Inevitable Collision States for Autonomous Emergency Braking (AEB) in Motorcycle-to-Car Crashes," presented a collaborative AEB system based on the interaction between a motorcycle and an opponent passenger car. This system used an inverted approach compared to standard MAEB: the safety system mounted on the motorcycle detects a possible conflict with an approaching passenger car and when the collision becomes imminent yet still avoidable, it deploys the full braking intervention of the AEB mounted on the opponent vehicle via V2V. Computer simulations of 90 real world crash cases revealed that in more than half the considered cases collaborative AEB may have prevented the collision. Despite some limitations in the study, these promising results warrant further investigations.
The first paper, titled "Autonomous emergency braking for cornering motorcycle", presented an advanced MAEB that can safely deploy a full braking even when the motorcycle is negotiating a bend. This system, named MAEB+, combined standard MAEB and ABC (active braking control), a module designed to adjust the braking distribution between front and rear wheel in order to produce a stabilisation of the vehicle along its trajectory. The paper also presented detailed computer simulations of three real world crashes from the InSafe dataset. Each case simulated in the actual configuration (without MAEB), with standard MAEB, and with MAEB+. The results showed that MAEB+ was able to slow down the motorcycle with higher deceleration compared to simple MAEB, without producing falling events in the pre-collision phase. These results indicated that a stability module associated to MAEB can make the system more robust even when the rider attempts lateral manoeuvres before the collision.
 |
| One of the crash cases simulated for ESV2015 |
The second paper, titled "Triggering Algorithm based on Inevitable Collision States for Autonomous Emergency Braking (AEB) in Motorcycle-to-Car Crashes," presented a collaborative AEB system based on the interaction between a motorcycle and an opponent passenger car. This system used an inverted approach compared to standard MAEB: the safety system mounted on the motorcycle detects a possible conflict with an approaching passenger car and when the collision becomes imminent yet still avoidable, it deploys the full braking intervention of the AEB mounted on the opponent vehicle via V2V. Computer simulations of 90 real world crash cases revealed that in more than half the considered cases collaborative AEB may have prevented the collision. Despite some limitations in the study, these promising results warrant further investigations.
 |
| Concept of the collaborative AEB presented at IV2015 |
Thursday, 26 February 2015
ABRAM WP4 motorcycle riding simulator
Another video of the ABRAM simulator in action during the validation tests.
In these tests, a small group of experienced riders were asked to perform simple control tasks.
At the end of the runs, the riders were asked to provide their subjective evaluations using Cooper Harper handling scale and Likert scales, and to provide a short narrative of their experience.
The initial results indicate that the subjective perception of the riders was generally positive or neutral with respect of the simple steer mechanism adopted. At the same time, this steer mechanism was able to provide realistic inputs, as shown in a comparison with simulations in Bikesim.
In these tests, a small group of experienced riders were asked to perform simple control tasks.
At the end of the runs, the riders were asked to provide their subjective evaluations using Cooper Harper handling scale and Likert scales, and to provide a short narrative of their experience.
The initial results indicate that the subjective perception of the riders was generally positive or neutral with respect of the simple steer mechanism adopted. At the same time, this steer mechanism was able to provide realistic inputs, as shown in a comparison with simulations in Bikesim.
Thursday, 19 February 2015
ABRAM motorcycle riding simulator is getting ready for the tests
The motorcycle riding simulator built for ABRAM is getting ready for validation and testing.
First impressions were promising. Despite its simplicity, the motorcycle rig mounted on D Box motion base provides adequate feeling to the rider.
First impressions were promising. Despite its simplicity, the motorcycle rig mounted on D Box motion base provides adequate feeling to the rider.
Tuesday, 24 June 2014
Autonomous emergency braking - First details about the field study
The tests of automatic deceleration events simulating the activation of motorcycle autonomous emergency braking (MAEB) were completed last week at the low speed test facility at Bosch Australia, Clayton, VIC.
The tests involved 15 participants (including one female rider) between 21 and 55 years old. Each participant was asked to ride the test vehicle along a stretch. While cruising at a constant speed of 40 km/h, the participants could experience unexpected decelerations of the motorcycle, designed to produce the effects of an autonomous emergency braking event. At the end of their test session, the participants were asked to report on their experience with the automatic decelerations via questionnaire and recorded interview.
Follow the link for a short video of the tests.
The tests involved 15 participants (including one female rider) between 21 and 55 years old. Each participant was asked to ride the test vehicle along a stretch. While cruising at a constant speed of 40 km/h, the participants could experience unexpected decelerations of the motorcycle, designed to produce the effects of an autonomous emergency braking event. At the end of their test session, the participants were asked to report on their experience with the automatic decelerations via questionnaire and recorded interview.
Follow the link for a short video of the tests.
 |
| Participant ready for a test run at the low speed test area |
Thursday, 12 June 2014
ABRAM is testing autonomous emergency braking for motorycles
The Monash University Accident Research Centre (MUARC) is conducting a pilot study to investigate the possible behaviours and the subjective perception of motorcycle riders when an automatic deceleration kicks in.
The test consists of mild decelerations of the motorcycle while traveling at a constant speed of 40 km/h along a straight in a flat area free from traffic and obstacles. The deceleration triggers at random time within a given time window. The decelerations are produced by cutting out the engine power thus making the vehicle slow down due to frictions with a constant deceleration of 2 m/s^2 (corresponding to 20% of a full braking action).
Thursday, 15 May 2014
Autonomous emergency braking - First on road experiments
The test vehicle of ABRAM is ready for the experiments on autonomous braking events.
If you want to take part to the experimental activity, simply fill in the contact form in this blog and you will receive further documentation including an explanatory form and a consent form.
If eligible, you will have the opportunity to be recruited as a participant in this pilot study of the ABRAM project held at Bosch in Clayton, VIC - Australia.
Thursday, 10 April 2014
New equipment for on road experiments of automatic decelerations
ABRAM WP3 target decelerations.
The new equipment for the tests of automatic decelerations with volunteer riders has just arrived.
The tests will involve 10 participants who will experience automatic mild decelerations while riding along a straight path (up to 40 km/h).
The automatic decelerations will be up to 0.3 g and will be produced by cutting the engine power via remote control at a random time. The participants will report about their experience with pseudo-autonomous decelerations. This is a first step to show the feasibility of unmanned emergency decelerations that may reduce the impact speed in case of an inevitable collision.
Thursday, 23 January 2014
Autonomous emergency braking for motorcycles featured on SBS News
A TV crew from SBS interviewed Dr Giovanni Savino about his research topic. The video of the interview was featured on SBS News on 22 January 2014.
See the video on demand on sbs.com.au (Expires on 29 Jan 2014)
"The over representation of motorcycle riders on our road toll has researchers focused on improving the safety of the two wheeled vehicles. A scientist from Italy is on a fellowship in Melbourne and pioneering an Australian first, creating a simulated motorcycle to test whether "autonomous emergency braking" could assist the rider in the case of an imminent collision. AEB is already used in some cars, to help reduce the risk of vehicle crashes." Copyright SBS 2014
See the video on demand on sbs.com.au (Expires on 29 Jan 2014)
Friday, 6 December 2013
Why motorcyclists should not fear the concept of automatic emergency braking
First of all, automatic braking is meant to intervene only in case of imminent collision, when the crash becomes physically unavoidable (i.e. whatever the rider's and the opponent vehicle's actions will be). Automatic braking represents only a last resort solution. This means that in normal riding conditions automatic braking is idle and does not interfere with the riding task.
Second aspect, automatic braking is set to produce only a mild deceleration (approx. 40% of the maximum value) and is designed to deploy only when conditions allow for it, meaning that the bike is travelling along a straight path (not leaning) and the rider is firmly holding the handle bar. In synthesis, the activation of automatic braking is designed to be safe in itself for the rider.
Third aspect, automatic braking is operated as long as the rider does not apply any control, e.g. when the rider has not realised that the collision is imminent (possibly due to distraction). As soon as the rider applied additional throttle or attempted a lateral avoidance manoeuvre, those actions would immediately override automatic braking. Automatic braking is designed not to oppose the rider's decision nor interfere with the rider's action.
Even when we accepted the concept of automatic braking, still we may not trust the technology behind it. But reasonably, no motorcycle manufacturer would even think to apply automatic braking to series vehicles unless the system is implemented in a fully safe and reliable way.
Finally, I would like to indicate a parallelism with a very common safety technology adopted on passenger cars.
I believe very few people would be consciously willing to experience airbag deployment while driving. Nevertheless, few people would buy a new car without airbags. In fact we all know that there is at least a small probability to get into a collision while driving, no matter how experienced, wise and skilled drivers we are. Differently, it would be much better to avoid keeping such threatening device just half a metre from our face: airbag is armed all the time, always ready to ignite. We are indeed reassured by its silent presence, idling all the time. We believe it can be of help as last resort solution in a crash, we do not expect to face any false triggering, we trust the deployment technology and we are aware that it does not interfere with the driving task, and neither with our possibility to try to avoid the collision.
*The reference addresses the automatic braking system described in Savino et al. 2012
Wednesday, 27 November 2013
Seminar at NeuRA: "Emerging researchers in impact injury biomechanics"
On 5th December 2013 I will be presenting at the postgraduate student and early career researchers seminar in Sydney organised by NeuRA.
My presentation will be titled:
Automatic emergency braking for motorcycles: potential benefits and current challenges
Link to the flier
Thursday, 21 November 2013
International Motorcycle Safety Conference - Manuscript from ABRAM - II
Can experienced riders benefit from an autonomous emergency braking system?
Here is a copy of the original manuscript: full text (pdf)
Friday, 30 August 2013
Background of MAEB - First motorcycle equipped with autonomous emergency braking ever built
The first autonomous emergency braking system for motorcycles (MAEB) was created in 2008 by the PISa project (acronym standing for Powered two wheeler Integrated Safety).
The idea to study such a safety system came when the team of researchers and engineers involved in PISa analysed the state of the art of road crash investigation in Europe and around the globe, finding that an autonomous braking of the motorcycle may have positively affected a large proportion of the past crashes involving powered two wheeler riders, including severe and fatal cases.
The embedded prototype system integrated sensors, a small laser scanner detecting the obstacles in the path, several interfaces with the rider including a vibrating saddle and an haptic throttle, the automatic braking device and an electronic control unit.
The system was extensively tested in 2009 in the test track of the TRL involving a team of professional riders. Those initial tests focused on basic crash configurations with static and moving obstacles.
References
Savino, G., 2013. Autonomous emergency braking for powered two wheeler application. LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing.
Savino, G., Pierini, M., Baldanzini, N., 2012. Decision logic of an active braking system for powered two wheelers. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part D: Journal of Automobile Engineering 226 (8), 1026-1036.
Symeonidis, I., Kavadarli, G., Erich, S., Graw, M., Peldschus, S., 2012. Analysis of the stability of ptw riders in autonomous braking scenarios. Accid Anal Prev 49, 212-22.
Giovannini, F., Savino, G., Pierini, M., Baldanzini, N., 2013. Analysis of the minimum swerving distance for the development of a motorcycle autonomous braking system. Accident Analysis & Prevention 59, 170-184.
The idea to study such a safety system came when the team of researchers and engineers involved in PISa analysed the state of the art of road crash investigation in Europe and around the globe, finding that an autonomous braking of the motorcycle may have positively affected a large proportion of the past crashes involving powered two wheeler riders, including severe and fatal cases.
The embedded prototype system integrated sensors, a small laser scanner detecting the obstacles in the path, several interfaces with the rider including a vibrating saddle and an haptic throttle, the automatic braking device and an electronic control unit.
The system was extensively tested in 2009 in the test track of the TRL involving a team of professional riders. Those initial tests focused on basic crash configurations with static and moving obstacles.
 |
| Test vehicle of PISa equipped with MAEB prototype system |
Savino, G., 2013. Autonomous emergency braking for powered two wheeler application. LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing.
Savino, G., Pierini, M., Baldanzini, N., 2012. Decision logic of an active braking system for powered two wheelers. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part D: Journal of Automobile Engineering 226 (8), 1026-1036.
Symeonidis, I., Kavadarli, G., Erich, S., Graw, M., Peldschus, S., 2012. Analysis of the stability of ptw riders in autonomous braking scenarios. Accid Anal Prev 49, 212-22.
Giovannini, F., Savino, G., Pierini, M., Baldanzini, N., 2013. Analysis of the minimum swerving distance for the development of a motorcycle autonomous braking system. Accident Analysis & Prevention 59, 170-184.
Friday, 2 August 2013
Benefits of MAEB were confirmed in rear-end crash configurations
The latest study on the Autonomous Emergency Braking for Motorcycles (MAEB) was published on Traffic Injury Prevention.
The study was recently presented by Matteo Rizzi at the 23rd Enhanced Safety Vehicles Conference (ESV) held in Seoul, Korea in May 2013.
The study was recently presented by Matteo Rizzi at the 23rd Enhanced Safety Vehicles Conference (ESV) held in Seoul, Korea in May 2013.
ABSTRACT
The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility and quantitative potential benefits of a motorcycle autonomous emergency braking (MAEB) system in fatal rear-end crashes. A further aim was to identify possible criticalities of this safety system in the field of powered 2-wheelers (PTWs; e.g., any additional risk introduced by the system itself).
Seven relevant cases from the Swedish national in-depth fatal crash database were selected. All crashes involved car-following in which a non-anti-lock braking system (ABS)-equipped motorcycle was the bullet vehicle. Those crashes were reconstructed in a virtual environment with Prescan, simulating the road scenario, the vehicles involved, their pre-crash trajectories, ABS, and, alternatively, MAEB. The MAEB chosen as reference for the investigation was developed within the European Commission–funded
Powered Two-Wheeler Integrated Safety (PISa) project and further detailed in later studies, with the addition of the ABS functionality. The boundary conditions of each simulation varied within a range compatible with the uncertainty of the in-depth data and also included a range of possible rider behaviors including the actual one. The benefits of the MAEB were evaluated by comparing the simulated impact speed in each configuration (no ABS/MAEB, ABS only, MAEB).
The MAEB proved to be beneficial in a large number of cases. When applicable, the benefits of the system were in line with the expected values. When not applicable, there was no clear evidence of an increased risk for the rider due to the system.
MAEB represents an innovative safety device in the field of PTWs, and the feasibility of such a system
was investigated with promising results. Nevertheless, this technology is not mature yet for PTW application. Research in the field of passenger cars does not directly apply to PTWs because the activation logic of a braking system is more challenging on PTWs. The deployment of an autonomous deceleration would affect the vehicle dynamics, thus requesting an additional control action of the rider to keep the vehicle stable. In addition, the potential effectiveness of the MAEB should be investigated on a wider set of crash scenarios in order also to avoid false triggering of the autonomous braking.
Monday, 22 July 2013
Original Manuscript available on line - Evaluation of an autonomous braking system in real world PTW crashes
The original manuscript of the paper Evaluation of an autonomous braking system in real world PTW crashes published on Traffic Injury Prevention will be available for consultation soon.
To cite this article:
Giovanni Savino, Marco Pierini, Matteo Rizzi & Richard Frampton (2013): Evaluation of an Autonomous Braking System in Real-World PTW Crashes, Traffic Injury Prevention, 14:5, 532-543.
Preview of this article:
To cite this article:
Giovanni Savino, Marco Pierini, Matteo Rizzi & Richard Frampton (2013): Evaluation of an Autonomous Braking System in Real-World PTW Crashes, Traffic Injury Prevention, 14:5, 532-543.
Preview of this article:
Evaluation of an autonomous braking system in real world PTW crashes
Abstract
Powered two wheelers (PTWs) are becoming increasingly popular in Europe. They have the ability to get
around traffic queues, thus lowering fuel consumption and increasing mobility. The risk of rider injury in a traffic crash is however much higher than
that for their four wheeled counterparts. The European project Powered two wheeler Integrated Safety
(PISa), identified an autonomous braking system
(AB) as a priority to reduce the injury consequences
of a crash. This study assessed the potential effectiveness of the AB system developed in PISa, taking
into account the specific system characteristics that
emerged during the design, development and testing phases. Fifty eight PTW accidents representing
European crash configurations were examined. Two
of the largest crash types were a PTW impacting a
stationary object (CFS, 16%) and an object pulling
across the PTW path (CRS, 54%). 43% of the
crashes contained a rider with MAIS 2+ injury. In
67% of cases, the application of AB could have mitigated the crash outcome. Analysis of the real crash
cases under a complete set of possible rider reactions
showed the potential for an expert rider to avoid the
collision. An early reaction of the rider, associated
with a correct application of the brakes would have
avoided 18 out of 37 CFS and CRS crashes. Conversely, according to the analysis, an expert rider
would not have been able to avoid 19 out of 37 cases.
In 14 of the 19 cases, the AB would have contributed
to mitigate the crash outcomes.
This is an Author's Original Manuscript of an article submitted for consideration in Traffic Injury Prevention (copyright Taylor & Francis); Traffic Injury Prevention is available online at http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/15389588.2012.725878
This is an Author's Original Manuscript of an article submitted for consideration in Traffic Injury Prevention (copyright Taylor & Francis); Traffic Injury Prevention is available online at http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/15389588.2012.725878
Monday, 15 July 2013
MAEB at the imminent 2013 International Motorcycle Safety Conference
A study dealing with the autonomous emergency braking for motorcycles (MAEB) will be presented at the
International Motorcycle Safety Conference in Orlando, FL, USA (October 16-17, 2013), organized by the Motorcycle Safety Foundation.
The authors of the study are Giovanni Savino (1, 2), Marco Pierini (1), Matteo Rizzi (3), Richard Frampton (4), and Jason Thompson (2).
The authors will try to address the following question:
Can an expert rider benefit from an autonomous emergency braking system?
Affiliations
(1) Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Florence, Italy
(2) Monash University Accident Research Centre, Australia
(3) Folksam, Sweden
(4) Loughborough Design School, Loughborough University, UK
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)